> Far bigger offenses than this one have been quietly tolerated as an alternative to intrusion from a distant capital, all over the US and all through its history.
I think I understand. Is there a reasoning why there is no local oversight?
I get the small town argument. But here in Europe small towns fall under the jurisdiction of larger towns. How could this be considered "federal overstepping"?
I think I understand. Is there a reasoning why there is no local oversight?
I get the small town argument. But here in Europe small towns fall under the jurisdiction of larger towns. How could this be considered "federal overstepping"?