It's so incredible how two engineers can look at something like this and draw literally the opposite conclusion. Taste is certainly subjective...
To me, this is largely an argument for TOML. I mean,
> wishes = "I am fine"
This is an array with one element????
> Even TOML's featured example proposes “the INI way”
Obviously it is the TOML way too? Hence it being the featured example. That another way to express it doesn't change that...
It's almost comical how much their arguments are convincing me that INI is a disaster. And yet they are, seemingly in all seriousness, truly trying to convince me that this is the way.
To me, this is largely an argument for TOML. I mean,
> wishes = "I am fine"
This is an array with one element????
> Even TOML's featured example proposes “the INI way”
Obviously it is the TOML way too? Hence it being the featured example. That another way to express it doesn't change that...
It's almost comical how much their arguments are convincing me that INI is a disaster. And yet they are, seemingly in all seriousness, truly trying to convince me that this is the way.
What an odd field to be in.