Comment

Comment by fulladder

It seems like you're reacting to the phrase "bring programming to the people" occurring in the same sentence as Microsoft. I don't think GP was trying to present Bill Gates as having been on some kind of altruistic moral crusade. I think the point GP was making is that Microsoft was founded on compilers for hobbyists, whereas Apple was thinking about end user experience.

Maybe the phrase "to the people" is confusing things because it suggests some kind of noble, high-minded motivations on the part of Gates. That wasn't how Gates (or Jobs) thought. Actually, the whole idea of a company having some social responsibility mission was not something that existed at that time. These guys wanted to sell a product that people would pay money for, that's all. In that era, this was perfectly socially acceptable and completely normal.

The statement "Microsoft was founded to bring programming to the people" is true, but it may be a little unclear if people are reading it as suggesting something other than the profit motive. However, for a long time, Microsoft really did view its own success as dependent on providing customers ways to write and sell their own software. That is in fact empowering to the customer. I'm pretty sure Gates did care about this because it was what was driving sales of his products.

parent fulladder 3 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton