I'm of quite the opposite opinion. Within reason (importantly), I believe any public service, which is also managed by an anonymous, decentralized community, ought to be under test constantly and by anyone. What's the alternative, really?
Imagine if it was taboo to independently test the integrity of bitcoin for example.
The sibling mentioned the linux kernel case. I admit that one felt wrong. It was a legitimate waste of contributor time and energy, with the potential to open real security holes.
I don't pretend to have reconciled why one seems right to me and the other wrong.
Imagine if it was taboo to independently test the integrity of bitcoin for example.
The sibling mentioned the linux kernel case. I admit that one felt wrong. It was a legitimate waste of contributor time and energy, with the potential to open real security holes.
I don't pretend to have reconciled why one seems right to me and the other wrong.