>He’s a former government official who openly changes his messaging based on polling data, not scientific evidence. It’s not unreasonable to discount his public statements.
What nonsense. OP and you either have actual useful information that contradicts what OP specifically called out as inaccurate or you don;t.
You don't which is why you fixate on something else.
What nonsense. OP and you either have actual useful information that contradicts what OP specifically called out as inaccurate or you don;t.
You don't which is why you fixate on something else.