This isn't a case where people thought the wrong things and it made them vote wrong. It caused them to spread diseases to other people and kill them.
I'm honestly shocked that people think this is a case where the government should not step in. I think they should have been much more aggressive.
This judgment and the comments here just baffle me. The scientific consensus is that countries that took a much more proactive, aggressive approach were far more successful in preventing people from dying. And this isn't like a seatbelt issue where people just put themselves at risk.
The fact that people are defending the spread of false information that contributed to people literally dying in favor of a hypothetical tyranny problem just leaves me feeling completely lost.
I'm honestly shocked that people think this is a case where the government should not step in. I think they should have been much more aggressive.
This judgment and the comments here just baffle me. The scientific consensus is that countries that took a much more proactive, aggressive approach were far more successful in preventing people from dying. And this isn't like a seatbelt issue where people just put themselves at risk.
The fact that people are defending the spread of false information that contributed to people literally dying in favor of a hypothetical tyranny problem just leaves me feeling completely lost.