Is there a better phrasing you could use than "drop-in replacement" for a 1.0 release that has decided to not implement all of "node:"?
The let-down from the first two projects not being a drop-in replacement is jarring, now I have to be skeptical of all communications coming from bun.
For context, both projects use osc which requires dgram. I was able to find a feature request tracking ticket from 9 months ago with no communicated plans to implement, but searching for 'dgram' in this announcement page doesn't show anything.
For a quick suggestion - can you explicitly state what modules are not supported by bun 1.0 and put that in the section related to node.js compat?
The let-down from the first two projects not being a drop-in replacement is jarring, now I have to be skeptical of all communications coming from bun.
For context, both projects use osc which requires dgram. I was able to find a feature request tracking ticket from 9 months ago with no communicated plans to implement, but searching for 'dgram' in this announcement page doesn't show anything.
For a quick suggestion - can you explicitly state what modules are not supported by bun 1.0 and put that in the section related to node.js compat?
edit: found the docs on node support - https://bun.sh/docs/runtime/nodejs-apis . Would be nice to link in the release notes.
Cursory glance looks like for modules - 17 implemented - 17 partially implemented - 7 unimplemented