Comment by version_five

I'm a Microsoft critic on lots of fronts, but I can't understand how people consider bundling teams with office to be anti competitive. Isn't team communication essentially a modern feature of a productivity suite that you'd expect to see included? Why is it not considered to be meeting market demand. I consider it a plus to have everything integrated together (even if I don't particularly like Teams). What's the legal or moral basis for calling it anticompetitive? If anything it feels like a normal result of competitive pressure.