Right, the person I asked is claiming that NAND is two things. You appear to have responded as if you disagree with my comment while not actually disagreeing with any part of it.
What did you think I meant by this question?
>> In what conceivable sense is "doing a logical and" one thing while "doing a logical nand" isn't?
What did you think I meant by this question?
>> In what conceivable sense is "doing a logical and" one thing while "doing a logical nand" isn't?