The models can produce a very very biased memory (as any other form of history) - just by virtue of being a product of technology does not make these algorithms any more objective. They're trained on biased data after all.
So what we'll remember is the cliché form of everything. That's worth something in terms of history but is it an improvement over primary source material?
So what we'll remember is the cliché form of everything. That's worth something in terms of history but is it an improvement over primary source material?