> This entire piece is based on one massive, unsupported assertion, which is that LLM progress will cease.
Which is countered by...the assertion that it won't?
LLMs won't get intelligent. That's a fact based on their MO. They are sequence completion engines. They can be fine tuned to specific tasks, but at their core, they remain stochastic parrots.
> I want to know only one thing, which is what gives him the confidence necessary to say that.
I want to know only one thing, what gives the confidence to say otherwise?
Which is countered by...the assertion that it won't?
LLMs won't get intelligent. That's a fact based on their MO. They are sequence completion engines. They can be fine tuned to specific tasks, but at their core, they remain stochastic parrots.
> I want to know only one thing, which is what gives him the confidence necessary to say that.
I want to know only one thing, what gives the confidence to say otherwise?