So to evade hyperinflation one uses an asset which is more volatile, and in the case of BTC, is deflationary by nature. Which as in _investment_ is fine, but as a means of payment not, as the whole essence of a _sensible_ amount (2-3%) of inflation is a driver for economic growth. The problem with this statement is that using one evil to escape the other which doesn't make sense.
Countries with a weak rule of law shouldn't (monetary wise) not be made weaker by using a volatile and highly (let's not deny it..) manipulative asset.
Countries with a weak rule of law shouldn't (monetary wise) not be made weaker by using a volatile and highly (let's not deny it..) manipulative asset.