> I really dislike the way this article presents React as the silver bullet.
It didn't read like that to me, I thought the point was they went for a rewrite on the new breaking changes major version, expecting specific features to eventually land, were waiting for them, and React had them already.
So it's more (to me) like 1) don't do that; 2) if you're going to do that maybe take a step back and there's something else out there already or that's a better fit.
It didn't read like that to me, I thought the point was they went for a rewrite on the new breaking changes major version, expecting specific features to eventually land, were waiting for them, and React had them already.
So it's more (to me) like 1) don't do that; 2) if you're going to do that maybe take a step back and there's something else out there already or that's a better fit.