I might just be tired, but it seems like this article is poorly written. Which contention is tied to the alleged front group? Is Coca-Cola trying to get us to believe that aspartame is dangerous, or are they trying to get us to believe it's not dangerous?
It's not immediately obvious to me that Coca Cola would benefit from either argument. Don't they sell a crapload of aspartame?
It's not immediately obvious to me that Coca Cola would benefit from either argument. Don't they sell a crapload of aspartame?