> Hyun-Tak Kim is unlikely to ruin his career and legacy for something careless and frivolous.
you came with presumption that this man knows & understands the subject matter. that is a very bold assumption given the mounting evidence against such brief.
> so lets assign a 10% probability
why 10%? not 0.01%? because of his "prof." title or previous publications? Surely that won't change the course of nature I thought?
> and then from reputed Western researchers/labs.
what makes you discount inputs from Russian, Chinese, Japanese researchers?
You seem to have some really wired brief here, get some help I say.
you came with presumption that this man knows & understands the subject matter. that is a very bold assumption given the mounting evidence against such brief.
> so lets assign a 10% probability
why 10%? not 0.01%? because of his "prof." title or previous publications? Surely that won't change the course of nature I thought?
> and then from reputed Western researchers/labs.
what makes you discount inputs from Russian, Chinese, Japanese researchers?
You seem to have some really wired brief here, get some help I say.