> It already supports a number of obscure options (you can make QEMU claim to support a CPU feature regardless of whether the host CPU supports it, really?), so adding one more woild fit in just fine.
> Nope. “there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release”.
I could see that being the response of an individual open-source developer working for free. But that was IBM saying that, and people pay big bucks to IBM to fix things like this.
> Nope. “there are no plans to address it further or fix it in an upcoming release”.
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408810>
I could see that being the response of an individual open-source developer working for free. But that was IBM saying that, and people pay big bucks to IBM to fix things like this.