This is the consequence of lack of self-sovereignty, along with the lack of an agreed universal naming system.
That said, I’m not sure that first-come-first-wins is simultaneously fair, in such a universal environment. Nor, really, do I want it to be a “whoever can pay most gets the desirable names”, like DNS works.
I don’t have a better solution right now, but acknowledge that there’s a problem with the combination/intersection of “rarity” and “ownership” and such.
Are there any solutions that are even close to … some kind of fairness, or even approximation of a system that respects… anything?
That said, I’m not sure that first-come-first-wins is simultaneously fair, in such a universal environment. Nor, really, do I want it to be a “whoever can pay most gets the desirable names”, like DNS works.
I don’t have a better solution right now, but acknowledge that there’s a problem with the combination/intersection of “rarity” and “ownership” and such.
Are there any solutions that are even close to … some kind of fairness, or even approximation of a system that respects… anything?