No. The analogy here is this: Every time I hand you your monthly subscription of software, you can do anything allowed by the GPL. However, if you threaten my business, I can stop your monthly subscription.
You have the GPL rights for everything I've given you. I don't have to continue to convey the rights to new things to you if I don't like how you use them.
If Red Hat were selling GPL'ed software for navigation systems to a supplier in Country A and it turned out that they were re-distributing that software to Country B to bomb Country C, nobody would blink if Red Hat refused to stop doing business with that supplier. The imaginary obligations that people have invented around the GPL wouldn't allow Red Hat to discontinue that relationship.
You have the GPL rights for everything I've given you. I don't have to continue to convey the rights to new things to you if I don't like how you use them.
If Red Hat were selling GPL'ed software for navigation systems to a supplier in Country A and it turned out that they were re-distributing that software to Country B to bomb Country C, nobody would blink if Red Hat refused to stop doing business with that supplier. The imaginary obligations that people have invented around the GPL wouldn't allow Red Hat to discontinue that relationship.