Sorry I can't understand this comment.
> Still surprising to see a poorly written piece of text.
What's the subject of this sentence fragment? Are you relying on a colloquial implied "It" (as in "It's still...") or perhaps you are talking about your own surprise, e.g. "I still find it surprising..."?
> Nubank's comm leadership
Is this some slang for PR department? Or maybe Communications Team leadership?
> would have an extensive language background in English
I'm sorry, I don't follow at all. Hazarding a guess by rearranging the words a bit - do you mean: "would have an extensive background in the English language"?
I'm not sure how you can determine the background of someone by how fluently they can write a language - particularly when the piece in question is written better than what most college students in the US can produce.
> Still surprising to see a poorly written piece of text.
What's the subject of this sentence fragment? Are you relying on a colloquial implied "It" (as in "It's still...") or perhaps you are talking about your own surprise, e.g. "I still find it surprising..."?
> Nubank's comm leadership
Is this some slang for PR department? Or maybe Communications Team leadership?
> would have an extensive language background in English
I'm sorry, I don't follow at all. Hazarding a guess by rearranging the words a bit - do you mean: "would have an extensive background in the English language"?
I'm not sure how you can determine the background of someone by how fluently they can write a language - particularly when the piece in question is written better than what most college students in the US can produce.