> While most Lyme disease patients who are diagnosed and treated early can fully recover, 10 to 20 percent suffer from persistent symptoms, some seriously disabling.
There's no evidence that chronic Lyme exists:
> There is no evidence to suggest that “chronic Lyme” exists, or that long-term antibiotics are required to treat it.
There's no evidence that chronic Lyme exists:
> There is no evidence to suggest that “chronic Lyme” exists, or that long-term antibiotics are required to treat it.
(https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/avoid-prolonged-antibiotics...)
It's pseudoscientific and pretty dangerous nonsense at that.