Ya, it's not actually a lisp. I can't find the source but José has stated part of the idea was to give you lisp-like metaprogramming with a non-lisp syntax (sorry, José, if I have mis-quoted).
Even the regular syntax is sort of lispish, though, if you remove the syntactic sugar. It's all macros and datastructres.
Even the regular syntax is sort of lispish, though, if you remove the syntactic sugar. It's all macros and datastructres.
is really: ...which is lispish if you squint the right way.