This precedent definitely won't be abused. Or at least most people here seem to think that?
I wish the article would go into detail what exactly the "transgressive behaviour" is, because now it is unclear to me how far I can take criticism that is either directly or indirectly linked to an individual.
For example, what if I have an extremely poor experience with a seller?
Does it matter if this seller is a business or some random individual getting rid of 2nd hand items?
What if the user being criticized is also anonymous?
In any case, I shall be using throwaway accounts more frequently just to be safe.
I wish the article would go into detail what exactly the "transgressive behaviour" is, because now it is unclear to me how far I can take criticism that is either directly or indirectly linked to an individual.
For example, what if I have an extremely poor experience with a seller? Does it matter if this seller is a business or some random individual getting rid of 2nd hand items? What if the user being criticized is also anonymous?
In any case, I shall be using throwaway accounts more frequently just to be safe.