> What content children get exposed to has always been the responsibility of parents. Assuming this bill has honest intentions (I don't believe it does) the issue here is more that parents are giving their children unrestricted access to the internet.
true, but the problem a friend of mine has is that he has no control over internet access for his kids outside his home.
this matter isn’t black and white.
> in the UK if you're doing something impolite you're generally breaking the law...
Swearing in public? That's a public order offence. Saying something mean online? That's hate speech. Protesting fossil fuels? That's disruptive. And so on..
true, but the problem a friend of mine has is that he has no control over internet access for his kids outside his home.
this matter isn’t black and white.
> in the UK if you're doing something impolite you're generally breaking the law... Swearing in public? That's a public order offence. Saying something mean online? That's hate speech. Protesting fossil fuels? That's disruptive. And so on..
it’s exactly the same across europe.