You're right in that it is still actively developed by two different companies, and that it is still utterly dominant in servers, desktops, and laptops... today.
Perhaps you would prefer "incumbent ISA"? But that would be a pointless exercise, because RISC-V is inevitable, and the new industry standard.
The intent was to express "not RISC-V" anyway. The parent already specifies which.
Perhaps you would prefer "incumbent ISA"? But that would be a pointless exercise, because RISC-V is inevitable, and the new industry standard.
The intent was to express "not RISC-V" anyway. The parent already specifies which.