Uhh... I proved that it's false because it leads to contradictions. That is literally a reductio ad absurdum - a proper proof. It's a transcendental argument against materialism.
In addition to it, I personally reject materialism because it fails to describe the universe properly, in particular the Big Bang.
The Big Bang is the beginning of all material universe - creatio ex nihilo. However, if there was a mathematical structure that sets the framework for the physical laws, there's a reality that transcends the material universe and exists prior to it. It's the only logically consistent worldview in my opinion.
This has even further implications but, you know, you can figure it out yourself.
In addition to it, I personally reject materialism because it fails to describe the universe properly, in particular the Big Bang.
The Big Bang is the beginning of all material universe - creatio ex nihilo. However, if there was a mathematical structure that sets the framework for the physical laws, there's a reality that transcends the material universe and exists prior to it. It's the only logically consistent worldview in my opinion.
This has even further implications but, you know, you can figure it out yourself.