Does anyone know the status with respect to support for deniability / repudiation? I can't tell where they landed, and they seem to have deleted the paragraph from prior drafts that mostly left me more confused.
Previously, their designs had explicitly lacked this feature, and they said they actively didn't want it, citing "terrorism", resulting in arguments with Ian Goldberg, the developer of Off-the-Record messaging.
The arguments on the bug tracker about power imbalances were maybe a bit better, but I still personally believe this to be an important property (and one which clients need to fully embrace, allowing the ability to edit any part of the message history so easily anyone could figure out how to do it).
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mls-archite...
Previously, their designs had explicitly lacked this feature, and they said they actively didn't want it, citing "terrorism", resulting in arguments with Ian Goldberg, the developer of Off-the-Record messaging.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mls-archite...
The arguments on the bug tracker about power imbalances were maybe a bit better, but I still personally believe this to be an important property (and one which clients need to fully embrace, allowing the ability to edit any part of the message history so easily anyone could figure out how to do it).
https://github.com/mlswg/mls-architecture/issues/50