> "Military target" is a curious phrase given that this seems to be civilian infrastructure (of course it's probably important for the military as well). Pre-war, looks like the bridge saw around 15k in daily traffic. https://www.zr.ru/content/news/920305-8-millionov-avtomobili...
It’s a valid military target because Russia uses it to resupply its military in Crimea.
If Russia doesn’t want people targeting their bridges as military targets perhaps the military shouldn’t use them.
> So the real question is, why is Ukraine attacking civilian infrastructure?
Because it’s a military target being used by the Russian military to resupply Crimea and also the forces in the land corridor nearby.
> Is that not terrorism?.
Nope
> And an even better question is, why is the West helping them do this?
Because kicking Russia out of Crimea is something that needs to happen.
It’s a valid military target because Russia uses it to resupply its military in Crimea.
If Russia doesn’t want people targeting their bridges as military targets perhaps the military shouldn’t use them.
> So the real question is, why is Ukraine attacking civilian infrastructure?
Because it’s a military target being used by the Russian military to resupply Crimea and also the forces in the land corridor nearby.
> Is that not terrorism?.
Nope
> And an even better question is, why is the West helping them do this?
Because kicking Russia out of Crimea is something that needs to happen.