What I don't understand is what the wahalla is really about, seems to be one of two:
:the board granted themselves an unusually high amount of stock when it was granted
:the company did performed too well in the interim bringing the value of their comp too high
seems odd to me as options are granted to 'upper management' as a performance incentive, so the lawsuit brought forth seems to base level br about the company doing too well
, that is to say if it is not about the first reason all along
seems odd to me as options are granted to 'upper management' as a performance incentive, so the lawsuit brought forth seems to base level br about the company doing too well , that is to say if it is not about the first reason all along