This is fake, right? Why would Wikidata touch this with a ten-foot pole?
There is a lot of paid promotion on Wikipedia and highly-motivated vandalism. Just because someone has reserves of ETH, they get to say what a valid edit is? It seems altogether antithetical to the free-knowledge open-source ethic of the WMF.
It is one thing to propose this as an extension for MediaWiki that some rando running a website may use. It's entirely another thing to mock this up as if it's part of Wikidata's own interface.
EDIT: Headline says "Wikipedia" but screenshots are allegedly "Wikidata" which is really different.
There is a lot of paid promotion on Wikipedia and highly-motivated vandalism. Just because someone has reserves of ETH, they get to say what a valid edit is? It seems altogether antithetical to the free-knowledge open-source ethic of the WMF.
It is one thing to propose this as an extension for MediaWiki that some rando running a website may use. It's entirely another thing to mock this up as if it's part of Wikidata's own interface.
EDIT: Headline says "Wikipedia" but screenshots are allegedly "Wikidata" which is really different.