To me, a more interesting question is how the students do after four years. Are the legacy students clustered toward the bottom 20% of the class? Are they evenly distributed in a way that suggests that legacy status didn't matter? Or did they do better, at least on average?
The admissions formula is so non-scientific that I don't think you can measure whether they would have gotten in or not.
The admissions formula is so non-scientific that I don't think you can measure whether they would have gotten in or not.