Did you catch the debate between them? Honestly LeCunn came off really badly in my opinion. Really gave no solid arguments against anything. I'm not arguing he was wrong, but man, there was almost zero substance to any of his refutations.
The truth is, I'd love to just roll with Lecunism, it's much easier to just flip off all the concerns and not think too hard about it. But I'm not one to take the easier path so I feel more compelled to be open minded about both sides of the argument.
The truth is, I'd love to just roll with Lecunism, it's much easier to just flip off all the concerns and not think too hard about it. But I'm not one to take the easier path so I feel more compelled to be open minded about both sides of the argument.