Do you think you might be onto a slippery slope here?
Eating animals is not a cornerstone of modern society, and none of the experience/ benefits of eating animals cannot be reproduced. Just like using lead in the gas, at some point as a society we might decide that the costs overweight the benefits.
I think we're waaaaaaay past the discussion - it's self evident that animal exploitation is a blight on the earth and on the animals, and the benefits are unclear (for 95% of the world).
So why keep going? Because "i want to"?
What would you think if people wanted to use leaded gas, or use DDT on their lawn? See the similarity?
Eating animals is not a cornerstone of modern society, and none of the experience/ benefits of eating animals cannot be reproduced. Just like using lead in the gas, at some point as a society we might decide that the costs overweight the benefits.
I think we're waaaaaaay past the discussion - it's self evident that animal exploitation is a blight on the earth and on the animals, and the benefits are unclear (for 95% of the world).
So why keep going? Because "i want to"?
What would you think if people wanted to use leaded gas, or use DDT on their lawn? See the similarity?