I would argue that’s a very good example of why it’s a bad law.
The intent is good, but what are we talking about here? This law, the “Digital Millennium Copyright Act”, used to pull down content that is effectively an invasion of privacy? How do those things at all intersect?
It’s too broad and too able to be abused. Laws should be very precise and narrow.
Regarding privacy, we should have laws on the books to protect one’s privacy in cases where the public as no interest of import.
The intent is good, but what are we talking about here? This law, the “Digital Millennium Copyright Act”, used to pull down content that is effectively an invasion of privacy? How do those things at all intersect?
It’s too broad and too able to be abused. Laws should be very precise and narrow.
Regarding privacy, we should have laws on the books to protect one’s privacy in cases where the public as no interest of import.