> Sure, it's great for readers as it allows them to read all the content from one reading app but, on the other hand, the publication can't provide a custom experience, or - what's most important for some publications - display ads. That's likely why RSS is slowly moving into obscurity, at least IMHO.
Sure. But a title-only RSS feed seems like a very reasonable compromise.
And it's so much better than what everyone seems to have moved to, which is email notification.
Sure. But a title-only RSS feed seems like a very reasonable compromise.
And it's so much better than what everyone seems to have moved to, which is email notification.