> ... the freedom to use, study, improve, and share your software.
Does this mean that the software released under an OSI license with the Commons Clause attached [1] is considered "free" by their definition? Because CC allows all of the above, but prohibits commercialization.
If not, then perhaps they should elaborate on that aspect.
Does this mean that the software released under an OSI license with the Commons Clause attached [1] is considered "free" by their definition? Because CC allows all of the above, but prohibits commercialization.
If not, then perhaps they should elaborate on that aspect.
https://commonsclause.com