That's a weird summary on what's been released from Twitter. They've been shown to do moderation and to receive issue reports both from users and third parties including gov sources. That's far from collusion.
Specifically, (unless I missed some document) they received reports and acted on them independently. There were cases of "report received and acted on", but no proof of "action forced even though employee disagreed".
Specifically, (unless I missed some document) they received reports and acted on them independently. There were cases of "report received and acted on", but no proof of "action forced even though employee disagreed".