(a) immediate changes to the licenses for open-source code created by developers that will allow access and/or use of any open-source code to humans only;
(b) we suggest revisions to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (``MIT'') license so that AI systems procure appropriate licenses from open-source code developers, which we believe will harmonize standards and build social consensus for the benefit of all of humanity rather than profit-driven centers of innovation;
(c) We call for urgent legislative action to protect the future of AI systems while also promoting innovation; and
(d) we propose that there is a shift in the burden of proof to AI systems in obfuscation cases..."
(a) immediate changes to the licenses for open-source code created by developers that will allow access and/or use of any open-source code to humans only;
(b) we suggest revisions to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (``MIT'') license so that AI systems procure appropriate licenses from open-source code developers, which we believe will harmonize standards and build social consensus for the benefit of all of humanity rather than profit-driven centers of innovation;
(c) We call for urgent legislative action to protect the future of AI systems while also promoting innovation; and
(d) we propose that there is a shift in the burden of proof to AI systems in obfuscation cases..."
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/2306/2306.09267.pdf