> For documents of prime importance, such as contracts and invoices
Few in the legal world actually use cryptographic signatures for signing things. It's vastly more common to use scanned hand signatures or just /s/ and an e-mail record of sign off.
Why? Because it has worked that way for hundreds of years. It's pretty uncommon for there to be a dispute about the fact of signature, and even if there is, cryptographic signature solutions don't necessarily solve it.
Few in the legal world actually use cryptographic signatures for signing things. It's vastly more common to use scanned hand signatures or just /s/ and an e-mail record of sign off.
Why? Because it has worked that way for hundreds of years. It's pretty uncommon for there to be a dispute about the fact of signature, and even if there is, cryptographic signature solutions don't necessarily solve it.