I don't really see how so many of these ended up in the wayback machine. My understanding is that they were supposed to seem like fairly unremarkable websites, but were built for basically one person. So it seems surprising that so many were visited by unrelated people.
Is there a log of who instigated a wayback archive? Could they have been a different group doing what this person was?
>Given that we cannot rule out ongoing risks to CIA employees or assets, we are not publishing full technical details regarding our process of mapping out the network at this time
I guess it's a hard thing to rule out, but I certainly hope the CIA isn't still using a communication method broken more than a decade ago.
Is there a log of who instigated a wayback archive? Could they have been a different group doing what this person was?
>Given that we cannot rule out ongoing risks to CIA employees or assets, we are not publishing full technical details regarding our process of mapping out the network at this time
I guess it's a hard thing to rule out, but I certainly hope the CIA isn't still using a communication method broken more than a decade ago.