> So there is never any economic need to transfer the cost of using the transportation network from those using it, to taxpayers at large.
Like most things in a thriving, functioning society, socializing the costs is what makes it work. Let me reframe your statement:
> So there is never any economic need to transfer the cost of using the education system from those using it, to taxpayers at large. In fact, socializing costs of education is what can cause economically non-viable education services to consume greater amounts of resources, and in doing so, burden the economy.
Yet this same education system is what has produced a society capable of enormous economic output over the relatively short history of public education.
Your argument is the most basic of libertarian nonsense that would argue that in past decades would argue that tax dollars collected in UT shouldn't fund interstate highways in CA.
Your argument is the most basic of libertarian nonsense that would argue that in past decades would argue that tax dollars collected in UT shouldn't fund interstate highways in CA.