Strange comment. This doesn't sound like a legitimate criticism because of "Here is the official commit undoing the change:" being not a link to a commit to start with, and secondly being a declined pull request, and thirdly for the reality that `master` writes `ggjt` header.
Really looks like some axe-grinding here, if I'm being honest. Especially because it takes very little effort to find out what the present header is by someone who can write software.
Really looks like some axe-grinding here, if I'm being honest. Especially because it takes very little effort to find out what the present header is by someone who can write software.