originally it correctly inferred that I wanted a framework for svg editors, the latest version assumes I want a js framework (I tried several times) until I clarify. It also insists that the framework cannot do editable text until I nudge it in the right direction.
Overall slightly worse but the code generated is still fine.
in the latest version it imported "from sklearn.preprocessing import normalize" without using it later. It also erroneously uses pytorch_cos_sim, which expects a pytorch tensor whereas we're putting in a numpy array.
overall I think the quality has degraded slightly, but not by enough that I would stop using it. Still miles ahead of Bard imo.
svg editor:
early april: https://chat.openai.com/share/c235b48e-5a0e-4a89-af1c-0a3e7c...
now: https://chat.openai.com/share/e4362a56-4bc7-45dc-8d1b-5e3842...
originally it correctly inferred that I wanted a framework for svg editors, the latest version assumes I want a js framework (I tried several times) until I clarify. It also insists that the framework cannot do editable text until I nudge it in the right direction.
Overall slightly worse but the code generated is still fine.
word embeddings:
early april: https://chat.openai.com/share/f6bde43a-2fce-47dc-b23c-cc5af3...
now: https://chat.openai.com/share/25c2703e-d89d-465c-9808-4df1b3...
in the latest version it imported "from sklearn.preprocessing import normalize" without using it later. It also erroneously uses pytorch_cos_sim, which expects a pytorch tensor whereas we're putting in a numpy array.
overall I think the quality has degraded slightly, but not by enough that I would stop using it. Still miles ahead of Bard imo.