Comment Comment by paulddraper I see the need, and good write up, but just use this for the definition of GET body.Nothing in the existing spec prevents GET from having a body, though there isn't currently a semantic meaning to it.This would fit perfectly, be more compatible and result in a simpler spec and protocol. parent paulddraper 3 years ago
Nothing in the existing spec prevents GET from having a body, though there isn't currently a semantic meaning to it.
This would fit perfectly, be more compatible and result in a simpler spec and protocol.