> who recently caught 40 of the 96 students [...] cheating
That 40 is reported suspected, by one individual. The same individual claims that only 2/3 of those were admitted at time of writing.
Also, suspicion was by only a 1:100 coincidence probability standard of evidence, and by some imperfect metric. IMHO, that threshold would be too low to "prove" guilt in such a potentially serious matter (negative mark on student record, reputational damage among college social and professional networking peers, and potentially including suspension or expulsion).
That 40 is reported suspected, by one individual. The same individual claims that only 2/3 of those were admitted at time of writing.
Also, suspicion was by only a 1:100 coincidence probability standard of evidence, and by some imperfect metric. IMHO, that threshold would be too low to "prove" guilt in such a potentially serious matter (negative mark on student record, reputational damage among college social and professional networking peers, and potentially including suspension or expulsion).