The problem with this whole thought process is it's hilariously abstract. The people in power have F-35s. What is your collection of (admittedly, unnecessarily powerful) guns going to do against that?
It also assumes that such disagreements require force to be resolved, and that's just demonstrably not always true. Even if it sometimes is.
It also assumes that such disagreements require force to be resolved, and that's just demonstrably not always true. Even if it sometimes is.