So tell me how you would write it where it's actually effective and a person surveilling you can't hack it, like having a child or dog, or any exception with them in the frame all the time. A person can call themselves "press," and be constitutionally correct; press can't be defined and credentialed by the state and be "free." I can't think of a way personally, but I'm open to ideas.
>Remember it's not (yet) an algorithm that has to be precisely specified.
Yes, but the more vague the more prone to state abuse and the more likely to be struck down.
Freedoms carry burdens, but the freedoms outweighs the burdens in nearly all cases.
>Remember it's not (yet) an algorithm that has to be precisely specified.
Yes, but the more vague the more prone to state abuse and the more likely to be struck down.
Freedoms carry burdens, but the freedoms outweighs the burdens in nearly all cases.