> thereby not addressing the issue at a fundamental level
This is true for almost everything politicians promote as a "solution"
> f literally remains unchanged with each interaction
For now, on a model weights level, sure. But we have no insights into the random seed, chain of calls, or external inputs that may be included. f may be thought of to include much more than "just the model", even today. The ChatGPT is making multiple API calls, one of which is the moderation endpoint after the completion call on the client side. So for most people, they actually see g which is something like g(f(H)))
For example, ChatGPT plugins change the game, as do the embedding databases and other attempts to deal with limited context.
This is true for almost everything politicians promote as a "solution"
> f literally remains unchanged with each interaction
For now, on a model weights level, sure. But we have no insights into the random seed, chain of calls, or external inputs that may be included. f may be thought of to include much more than "just the model", even today. The ChatGPT is making multiple API calls, one of which is the moderation endpoint after the completion call on the client side. So for most people, they actually see g which is something like g(f(H)))
For example, ChatGPT plugins change the game, as do the embedding databases and other attempts to deal with limited context.