> It's amazing how the confident tone lends credibility to all of that
made-up nonsense. Almost impossible for anybody without knowledge
of the book to believe that those "facts" aren't authorititative
and well researched.
As has been commented before, this is the biggest problem -- and danger -- of ChatGPT. If you have to verify every detail of its responses, what good was it to ask it in the first place?
(It does work for coding as you can -- usually -- immediately test the code to see if it yields the desired result, or ask it to provide a unit test for it.)
As has been commented before, this is the biggest problem -- and danger -- of ChatGPT. If you have to verify every detail of its responses, what good was it to ask it in the first place?
(It does work for coding as you can -- usually -- immediately test the code to see if it yields the desired result, or ask it to provide a unit test for it.)