Comment Comment by judofyr I'm confused here. If I'm reading this correctly, the following is happening:- Node 3 is the leader.- Node 1 is isolated (failure #1).- 10 records are written. They are successful because a majority is still alive (persisted to Node 2 and 3).- Node 3 loses data (failure #2).- Node 1 comes back up again.However, isn't this two failures at the same time? Kafka with three nodes can only guarantee a single failure, no? parent judofyr 3 years ago
- Node 3 is the leader.
- Node 1 is isolated (failure #1).
- 10 records are written. They are successful because a majority is still alive (persisted to Node 2 and 3).
- Node 3 loses data (failure #2).
- Node 1 comes back up again.
However, isn't this two failures at the same time? Kafka with three nodes can only guarantee a single failure, no?