> Being an OAuth 'provider' (emphasis) is not open source
Being an OAuth provider is precisely what everyone expects from a self-described "open source authentication service". If Supertokens does not support that out of the box, it should not really be called an open source authentication service.
I understand you want to capitalize from your work, but I feel this is a gross misrepresentation of a project.
Being an OAuth provider is precisely what everyone expects from a self-described "open source authentication service". If Supertokens does not support that out of the box, it should not really be called an open source authentication service.
I understand you want to capitalize from your work, but I feel this is a gross misrepresentation of a project.